They’ve done it again! The Reality Check episode 219 may just be the best episode yet. Darren leads off the show by exploring some recent research into whether men and woman can be platonic friends. Adam then provides a thorough listing of foods that contain animals that you may not have suspected. Pat rounds out the show with the myth of the week: Did Van Halen ask for all brown M&Ms to be removed from their snacks backstage at their shows?
Download direct: mp3 file
If you like the show, please leave us a review on itunes.
SHOW NOTES
Can Men and Women be Friends
Foods with Animal Products
Foods which contain hidden animal products for reading labels
Semi-vegetarianism – Wikipedia
Van Halen Brown M&Ms
An interesting aside, Worchester sauce is in fact a derivative of an ancient Roman sauce called garum. They are both fermented fish sauces. Soya sauce and teriyaki sauce are also considered to be derivatives.
Sorry, Worcestershire.
I sure had a hard time pronouncing that one! Didn’t realise Soya Sauce and Teriyaki were based on Wer… that other one. I’ve never actually had it.
Why would men be more attracted to women friends than the opposite? There was a psycho-evolutionary theory mentioned (there is another one saying it was also beneficial to women to sleep with a lot of men to make sure more people would take care of their children)… But you didn’t talk about the social one… We all assume it is normal for men to be attracted to so many women, because it is manly and it’s their testosterone, but a woman attracted to many men wouldn’t be well seen. It is often pictured as ‘normal’ for men to look at other women even if they are in another relationship (eh, it’s natural!!), but women shouldn’t say it out loud. So isn’t it normal that the woman downplay her libido and attraction to other men, while the opposite is also true? I know the study was confidential, but we internalise social pressure.
Hi Jo,
Thanks for the comment. While it is true that in our society women are taught, informally or formally, to be less sexual and that overt sexuality is less acceptable (of course, the success of Madonna and all the other pop tarts is an interesting counter), I don’t think this would necessarily translate into affecting the outcomes of this study. You are correct people internalize but it is hard to say if it would make a difference in the conditions of the experiment.
I didn’t mention this because there is less overt data backing it up (or if there is, I just don’t’ know about it (but I can be honest and say I haven’t looked hard)).